View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0012028 | Scribus | General | public | 2014-01-30 07:11 | 2016-12-08 22:04 |
| Reporter | christoph_s | Assigned To | fschmid | ||
| Priority | normal | Severity | feature | Reproducibility | have not tried |
| Status | assigned | Resolution | open | ||
| Product Version | 1.5.0svn | ||||
| Target Version | 1.5.4 | ||||
| Summary | 0012028: More sophisticated drop shadow options | ||||
| Description | This is actually a feature request from the "give an inch and take a mile" department, but even QuarkXPress's drop shadow options are more sophisticated than Scribus's. InDesign does it even better (see, e.g.: http://www.wikihow.com/Add-a-Drop-Shadow-in-InDesign). Just to be clear: We do *not* need this for 1.6, and until the PP has been put to rest in exchange for something more flexible, this extension shouldn't be even considered, especially since we don't have object/item styles yet. I only added this feature request as a reminder. There are certain features that creative workers expect in a DTP software these days, and those drop shadow options are essential to them. | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Patch | |||||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-01-30 07:11 | christoph_s | New Issue | |
| 2014-01-30 07:11 | christoph_s | Status | new => assigned |
| 2014-01-30 07:11 | christoph_s | Assigned To | => fschmid |
| 2014-07-09 14:33 | Kunda | Relationship added | child of 0012505 |
| 2016-01-23 17:16 | cbradney | Target Version | 1.5.1 => 1.5.3 |
| 2016-12-08 22:04 | Kunda | Target Version | 1.5.3 => 1.5.4 |
