|
|
Works with Adobe Minion Pro (OTF), Adobe Myriad Pro (OTF), URW fonts (Type 1), Times Roman, Times New Roman (Type 1), Nimbus Roman No9 L (Type 1), Nimbus Mono L (Type 1), Luxi Serif (Type 1), Adobe Helvetica (Type 1), Monotype Garamond (TTF). . Does not work with most other fonts, including Monotype Thorndale (TTF), Adobe Garamond (Type 1), Bitstream Charter (Type 1), Albertus MT Light (Type 1). |
|
|
christoph_s: haven't checked it yet (a screen shot would be nice, though), but Czech texts cannot principally work with fonts which don't include our specific ISO 8859-2 glyph set, e.g. Bitstream fonts you've mentioned are known for not working with our languages. The same applies to Polish, Hu, Slovenian, etc. To the other, good group belong Minion, Myriad, URW fonts and the other mentioned here: http://wiki.scribus.net/index.php/Darmowe_polskie_fonty_przeznaczone_do_druku |
|
2006-12-20 13:25
|
czech.png (234,763 bytes) |
|
|
Uploaded screenshot. The issue is with line breaks, not charakters. |
|
|
Uploaded screenshot. The issue is with line breaks, not characters. |
|
|
christoph_s: if you compare just the first line of your screen shot with the same text set in e.g. Times New Roman, you will notice _lots_ of missing characters in your screen shot, e.g. in "cevaž", "Vrovechrup", "prádtré" (c, e, r with haceks). |
|
|
>>>you will notice _lots_ of missing characters in your screen shot, e.g. in "cevaž", "Vrovechrup", "prádtré" (c, e, r with haceks). Yes three characters missing in the first line, and the alignment/linebreak is totally messed up. I still think there's something wrong. |
|
2006-12-20 15:55
|
czech_133.png (301,011 bytes) |
|
|
See also how 1.3.3x handles it. |
|
|
I think the only difference is that 133 shows red squares for missing glyphs and 134 just omits them (but counts their width for linebreaking). Do you see any other issue? |
|
|
avox: it would be of course much nicer to have the red squares as indication for missing glyphs in 1.3.4 too, but considering the fact that Czech lorem ipsum doesn't make any sense with fonts known for not supporting all Czech glyphs, I personally would see this as a significance=0 case. |
|
2006-12-20 23:34
|
4812-134.png (491,121 bytes) |
|
|
I uploaded for comparison a screenshot with Lido from a Czech type house. Looks OK to my non-slavic eyes. |
|
|
ad Lido: it looks as it should. I'll make some tests with my fonts later today |
|
|
missing glyphs still invisible in PDF, but do we really need it? |
|
|
>>> missing glyphs still invisible in PDF, but do we really need it? No. It's only important to display the missing glyphs in Scribus as a warning. Fixed. Thanks! |
- Anonymous
