View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0014691 | Scribus | Import / Export | public | 2017-03-18 00:21 | 2025-12-25 16:34 |
| Reporter | jeff | Assigned To | |||
| Priority | normal | Severity | feature | Reproducibility | N/A |
| Status | new | Resolution | open | ||
| Platform | Linux | OS | Fedora | OS Version | 25 |
| Product Version | 1.5.3.svn | ||||
| Summary | 0014691: guetzli perceptual JPEG encoder export option | ||||
| Description | TLDR: JPEG compression with 20-30% smaller filesize without breaking the standard. Worth considering for PDF export of photos and for image export? See https://github.com/google/guetzli/ And https://arstechnica.co.uk/information-technology/2017/03/google-jpeg-guetzli-encoder-file-size/ | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Patch | No | ||||
|
|
I'd like to retitle this to mention "MozJPEG or jpegli", but I don't know how. Could someone here do that? In my experience of the past few years, MozJPEG is lightning-fast with 30 to 50% filesize reduction at the same quality level (or you get much higher visual quality at the same filesizes, if you choose to crank the quality setting way up for some reason), and guetzli is unbearably slow to encode in comparison (if my experience with Yoga image encoder is any indication). As of a few months ago, there is also a new contender on the block called jpegli, which reportedly creates even better results than MozJPEG while still being just as fast. See: * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libjpeg#MozJPEG * https://opensource.googleblog.com/2024/04/introducing-jpegli-new-jpeg-coding-library.html |