View Issue Details

IDProjectCategoryView StatusLast Update
0009150ScribusStylespublic2014-06-04 16:18
Reportersubeditor Assigned To 
PrioritynormalSeverityfeatureReproducibilityalways
Status newResolutionopen 
PlatformPC AMD64 X2, Ati Radeon 3200OSUbuntuOS Version10.04
Product Version1.3.8svn 
Summary0009150: No First line offset in Styles
DescriptionSubj.
For example if you need headers with first line offset set to Font Ascent, you have to set it manually for every header occurrence.

In general Style should include settings for ALL text parameters that available in Scribus.
TagsNo tags attached.
Patch

Relationships

has duplicate 0010395 closedjghali set a "First line offset" in the styles 

Activities

christoph_s

2010-06-18 21:07

administrator   ~0024127

How should Scribus handle a case in which the style is applied to any other paragraph than the first one in a frame? I suggest we reserve this to a future frame style.

subeditor

2010-06-19 19:59

reporter   ~0024143

Yes, you are right. I was confused by placing this option in text section in current properties palette.
Text properties and text frame properties should be separated more clearly. I'll try to post feature request for this.
Please, close this bug.

subeditor

2010-06-19 20:26

reporter   ~0024145

But one more idea about handling such cases: style properties can be "triggered" by something, f.e. in described case first line offset should just be ignored if style is not first in frame.

christoph_s

2010-06-19 22:30

administrator   ~0024152

Wouldn't that be more complicated than it is now?

subeditor

2010-06-20 08:42

reporter   ~0024156

Last edited: 2010-06-20 08:42

Sure it will be, but such kind of automation (triggered by text position) should be implemented anyway, f.e. for orphans and widows or for "keep with next/previous" option.

FirasH

2014-06-04 15:11

developer   ~0032003

Similar to 0010395 .

ale

2014-06-04 15:59

manager   ~0032008

Last edited: 2014-06-04 16:18

if i understand it correctly, this is already implemented. 0010395 is probably not.

--- no, it's not implemented yet.

Issue History

Date Modified Username Field Change
2010-06-09 15:23 subeditor New Issue
2010-06-18 21:07 christoph_s Note Added: 0024127
2010-06-19 19:59 subeditor Note Added: 0024143
2010-06-19 20:26 subeditor Note Added: 0024145
2010-06-19 22:30 christoph_s Note Added: 0024152
2010-06-20 08:42 subeditor Note Added: 0024156
2010-06-20 08:42 subeditor Note Edited: 0024156
2014-06-04 15:11 FirasH Note Added: 0032003
2014-06-04 15:59 ale Note Added: 0032008
2014-06-04 16:00 ale Relationship added related to 0010395
2014-06-04 16:18 ale Note Edited: 0032008
2014-06-05 19:05 jghali Relationship deleted related to 0010395
2014-06-05 19:06 jghali Relationship added has duplicate 0010395