View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0001562 | Scribus | Graphics / Image Frames | public | 2005-01-18 01:40 | 2010-11-04 16:31 |
| Reporter | louisdesjardins | Assigned To | cbradney | ||
| Priority | normal | Severity | feature | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
| Platform | Linux | OS | Mandrake | OS Version | 10.1 |
| Product Version | 1.3 | ||||
| Target Version | 1.5.0 | Fixed in Version | 1.5.0svn | ||
| Summary | 0001562: "Scale to frame size" locks the image in the frame: no more free positionning | ||||
| Description | When the option "Scale to frame size" is checked, there is no way to freely and simply move the image around within its frame. What I understand (and I agree!) is the proportions have to be fixed to that image frame because this is the purpose of this option. But I think preventing users from *moving* the image *at that scale* into the image frame is a bit restrictive. | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Patch | |||||
| related to | 0000052 | closed | christoph_s | Image Position values are reset to 0 sometimes, possibly on loading. |
| related to | 0005662 | acknowledged | Positioning of image within image frames. |
|
|
moving to 1.2.2.. fixable ? |
|
|
I played with this a bit and the current behaviour seems sane to me. If I scale an image to a frame, I want the image locked to that frame. The workaround if you will is trivial. Switch back to free scaling and the image can be moved within a frame. Scribus is 'well-behaved' in that it does not adjust the scaling any further - unless - you explicitly change it. I certainly would put this as a feature request, not a bug honestly..At this point, I cannot recommend a change to current stable 1.2.2cvs. I am open to be persauded, as always. Bumping to 1.3 as a feature. |
|
|
Disagree. Scale to frame size means just that, does not relate to positioning within the frame. |
|
|
what about automatically switching to free scaling if user requests to move the picture? |
|
|
Reminder sent to: cbradney, cbradney, plinell: "acknowledged" or "won't fix"? |
|
|
jo-hannes' idea makes the most sense to me. |
|
|
spot on |
|
|
I'm still of the opinion that theres free scaling/scaled to frame size and that whether its locked to the frame's origin is a separate matter and this restriction just shouldn't be there. |
|
|
Exactly. We don't expect something to be locked unless we locked it. |
|
|
yes, i completely agree. me (and my girlfriend, too) think that the image frame misses one important option: to scale/crop/move an image _inside_ the frame and then being able to scale that frame as itself by dragging it`s borders - with the contents then resizing appropriate (proportional or not proportional) there is no easy way to do this now - typically you need to rework that image in an external program (gimp or whatelse) the current behaviour seems a little bit too restrictive - sort of "all or nothing". If i set "scale to frame size" it always refers to the complete image. |
|
|
Scribus already crops by the way.. |
|
|
you mean you select properties->edit shape->move-nodes? yes, we can crop with that - but did you ever try to resize that cropped image then? with "free scaling", the frame and the shape scales, but not the image inside. with "scale to frame" the _whole_ image will always be "refitted" automatically to the frame. what is missing here is some "lock/unlock" option. |
|
|
No, just move the resize handles |
|
|
Reminder on the road to 1.4 (please also let me know if this is ok to remind!) |
|
|
This is an old bug which shold get resolved one way or another. |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-01-18 01:40 | louisdesjardins | New Issue | |
| 2005-01-18 13:34 | cbradney | Relationship added | related to 0000052 |
| 2005-04-07 21:32 |
|
Note Added: 0004137 | |
| 2005-04-07 21:32 |
|
Product Version | 1.2.1 => 1.2.2cvs |
| 2005-04-10 18:17 |
|
Note Added: 0004223 | |
| 2005-04-10 18:18 |
|
Note Edited: 0004223 | |
| 2005-04-10 18:19 |
|
Severity | tweak => feature |
| 2005-04-10 18:19 |
|
Product Version | 1.2.2cvs => 1.3 |
| 2005-04-11 15:37 | cbradney | Note Added: 0004230 | |
| 2006-01-28 14:29 | jo-hannes | Note Added: 0008439 | |
| 2006-04-15 17:45 | mhanski | Note Added: 0010011 | |
| 2006-04-29 20:24 | mhanski | Status | new => feedback |
| 2006-04-29 20:29 | christoph_s | Note Added: 0010636 | |
| 2006-04-30 03:57 | PLucAuclair | Note Added: 0010671 | |
| 2006-04-30 08:59 | cbradney | Note Added: 0010677 | |
| 2006-04-30 11:00 | louisdesjardins | Note Added: 0010693 | |
| 2006-06-04 15:18 | devzero | Note Added: 0011571 | |
| 2006-06-04 23:56 | PLucAuclair | Note Added: 0011574 | |
| 2006-06-05 00:10 | devzero | Note Added: 0011575 | |
| 2006-06-05 00:11 | devzero | Note Edited: 0011575 | |
| 2006-06-05 00:24 | PLucAuclair | Note Added: 0011576 | |
| 2008-02-05 18:52 | christoph_s | Relationship added | related to 0005662 |
| 2010-02-16 16:54 | louisdesjardins | Note Added: 0023301 | |
| 2010-02-20 22:32 |
|
Note Added: 0023363 | |
| 2010-02-20 22:32 |
|
Status | feedback => new |
| 2010-02-20 22:32 |
|
Target Version | => 1.4.0svn |
| 2010-06-14 20:34 | cbradney | Target Version | 1.4.0svn => 1.4.0 |
| 2010-11-03 21:33 | cbradney | Status | new => resolved |
| 2010-11-03 21:33 | cbradney | Fixed in Version | => 1.5.0svn |
| 2010-11-03 21:33 | cbradney | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2010-11-03 21:33 | cbradney | Assigned To | => cbradney |
| 2010-11-03 21:34 | cbradney | Target Version | 1.4.0 => 1.5.0 |
| 2010-11-04 16:31 | cbradney | Status | resolved => closed |
| 2015-09-17 20:10 | Kunda | Category | Graphics / Image Frames => Graphics/Img Frames |
| 2015-09-17 20:11 | Kunda | Category | Graphics/Img Frames => Graphics / Image Frames |
