|
|
linespacing.png (88,126 bytes) |
|
|
I should note that Adobe InDesign behaves in same manner, i.e. calculate leading as space between baselines of current line and previous one. So if smaller text follows after larger one mess occurs. Quark seems to use classic type of leading - space between lines, applied above and below line (butt or overlaped, or just line placed in a middle - I don't know). So lines with auto leading never get overlapped in Quark. MS Word and Open Office seem to use some hybrid algorithm: space applied above lines, but it is measuring not between baselines, but between lines hight. What Scribus should do? Let's think together. |
|
|
Current algorithm leads to one more issue. If difference in font sizes is large enough (first line has bigger one) you can't set frame size to keep only first (larger) line in it - it behaves as if "keep with next" option were enabled. See attached file quasi-keepwithnext.sla |
|
|
|
- Anonymous
