View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0001172 | Scribus | General | public | 2004-10-01 18:48 | 2006-04-26 21:30 |
| Reporter | packetbell | Assigned To | |||
| Priority | normal | Severity | feature | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | feedback | Resolution | open | ||
| Product Version | 1.3 | ||||
| Summary | 0001172: Document Hierarchy | ||||
| Description | Introduction of an hierarchy within Scribus that can be used for page numbering, index generation, table of illustrations, etc. Project > Document > Chapter > Section > Page > Frame > Paragraph Project would be the root of the hierarchy. It can contain multiple individual .sla documents. I think it would be a good idea to define a project as a folder, so Scribus can keep track of the documents than are part of a project easier, and archive/tar the folder as one file for portability. | ||||
| Additional Information | For example: Chapter 1.14 Syntax: Chapter <chapter>.<section> Figure 12.2 Syntax: Figure <chapter>.<imagecount> | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Patch | |||||
| related to | 0000111 | closed | cbradney | Scribus Document File format |
| related to | 0000128 | closed | TeX rendering engine library | |
| related to | 0003451 | closed | Support for publications containing multiple documents/chapters | |
| related to | 0002107 | acknowledged | Master documents | |
| related to | 0003896 | acknowledged | Metabug: Scientific Publishing |
|
|
Reminder sent to: christoph_s chrisoph, what do you think, is this in any way related or perhaps even a duplicate of 0002107? |
|
|
I don't think the featuere is absolutely necessary, if working with document objects is better documented. This is probably more flexible than the TeX/word processor approach. The issue is, however, related, in the sense that master documents will need to be able to handle existing sections and document items. |
|
|
Christoph, what do you mean by "if working with document objects is better documented"? Why would a heirarchy not be required for numbering? |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-10-01 18:48 | packetbell | New Issue | |
| 2004-10-01 19:28 | cbradney | Product Version | => 1.3 |
| 2006-04-12 11:12 | mhanski | Relationship added | related to 0000111 |
| 2006-04-12 11:12 | mhanski | Relationship added | related to 0000128 |
| 2006-04-26 14:25 | mhanski | Relationship added | related to 0003451 |
| 2006-04-26 14:25 | mhanski | Relationship added | related to 0002107 |
| 2006-04-26 14:29 | mhanski | Note Added: 0010486 | |
| 2006-04-26 14:29 | mhanski | Status | new => feedback |
| 2006-04-26 18:18 | christoph_s | Note Added: 0010502 | |
| 2006-04-26 21:30 | mkoren | Note Added: 0010516 | |
| 2006-06-07 19:22 | christoph_s | Relationship added | related to 0003896 |
